Good Better Best Reviews
← Home

Our Methodology

The rubric describes the evidence we intend to collect for a scored profile. A product is not presented as an independent editorial review until the page identifies dated evidence for its claims and scores.

Tier Thresholds

Gold

90–100 pts

Silver

75–89 pts

Bronze

60–74 pts

Disqualified

< 60 pts

The 100-Point Rubric

Feature Completeness & Efficacy

30%

We compare official documentation, pricing, policies, and dated independent evidence when available. We do not present hands-on testing or performance benchmarks unless the page identifies the test method and source.

Pricing Transparency & Value

25%

Are all costs clearly disclosed? We penalize hidden fees, deceptive trial structures, and pricing that doesn't match the landing page. We compare value against the category average.

Regulatory Compliance & Security

20%

The most critical pillar for health and finance. Products that fail compliance checks are automatically disqualified regardless of their score on other pillars.

Customer Support & Onboarding

15%

We evaluate response time, support channels, documentation quality, and how long it takes to go from signup to productive use.

Market Presence & Consumer Sentiment

10%

We use dated, attributable customer or market evidence when it can be verified. An aggregate review-site rating is not treated as an editorial score without a documented source, date, scope, and methodology.

What Gets Disqualified

  • Score below 60 on the overall rubric
  • Health products failing FDA compliance checks
  • GLP-1 providers using 'generic Ozempic/Wegovy' language
  • Financial tools with FINRA or SEC enforcement actions
  • Any product with systematically hidden pricing
  • Companies caught gating or suppressing negative reviews

Evidence standard

Product facts are checked against current first-party material where possible. Editorial scores, tier assignments, review sections, and aggregate ratings require a dated evidence record. If that record is missing or stale, the page uses neutral profile language instead of implying that we personally tested the product.

Current evidence coverage

The registry currently tracks 161 product profiles. 0 are editorial-ready with both required evidence fields; 161remain profile-only until their dated editorial evidence is recorded.

Editorial Independence

We earn affiliate commissions when you buy through some links. Those relationships are disclosed and do not substitute for evidence. A commercial relationship cannot create a score, tier, rating, or claim that the evidence record does not support.